ARTICLES

SHARE THIS

‘We need everybody to work together’: As denials grow, health systems are responding with strategic, data-driven approaches

Originally Published on Becker’s Healthcare

The nation’s largest payers reported billions in profits in 2023. Yet, denials continue to rise. 

Further, a recent survey of consumers found 18% of insured adults experienced denied healthcare claims in the past year. Meanwhile, many health systems are operating with negative margins or margins hovering close to zero. 

Becker’s Healthcare recently spoke with Jerilyn Morrissey, MD, chief medical officer at CorroHealth, about how effective denial management strategies can improve the quality of patient care, as well as financial stability for hospitals and health systems. 

Question: What are the most common reasons for healthcare denials today, and how have these reasons evolved in recent years? 

Dr. Jerilyn Morrissey: There’s a plethora of reasons for healthcare denials, and they seem to be growing exponentially. The most common denials relate to prior authorizations, medical necessity, coding and diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) documentation, and technical or administrative issues. Denials reduce access to patient care and impact hospital and health system reimbursements. 

Looking back in time, the most significant change is the increasing number and frequency of denials. Decades ago, denials were reserved for a tiny fraction of expensive treatments or procedures. Now, denials occur for everyday encounters and medical treatments. We routinely see diabetics whose insulin is denied or asthmatics whose inhalers are denied. We can clearly demonstrate that denial rates were steadily rising prior to and after the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2022 and 2023, we saw a nearly 56% increase in Medicare Advantage denials and a 20% increase in commercial denials. 

Where is the ceiling on what and how much can be denied? Automation of claims processing by payers makes claims review cheap and easy. As a result, the opportunities and reasons to deny seem to be limitless. 

Q: Can you describe some of the innovative strategies that have proven effective in managing and reducing payer denials? 

JM: If we had this conversation five or six years ago, we would have discussed the tactics that hospitals and health systems used to anticipate or prevent denials. Unfortunately, we as an industry slowly and painfully discovered that this approach only led to significantly less reimbursement, and denial rates continued to increase. 

Today, especially in the Medicare Advantage space, hospitals and health systems are taking a different approach. Effective strategies start with understanding what’s in an organization’s ability to control. Organizations can influence how they behave, what they expect to be reimbursed for and how they hold payers accountable. 

Understanding whether your current tools and systems are inadvertently supporting denial activity requires sophisticated data that goes beyond common metrics like denial, observation and overturn rates. You must look at these rates as an end-to-end process and in relation to the overarching goal of fair and compliant reimbursement for services. 

Everyone turns to automation as a quick fix. But automating a broken workflow will only get you more of the same or possibly worse outcomes. Successful approaches for managing denials address specific payer tactics in a strategic manner. It’s not a one-size-fits-all solution. 

Q: How do effective denial management practices influence healthcare organizations’ financial stability and patient care quality? 

JM: When we talk about denial management or anything in healthcare, we must remember that patients are at the heart of all these conversations. Denials are a significant burden on patients, resulting in care being delayed or not received altogether. This potentially leads to further declines in health status. Patients are often faced with weighing increased out-of-pocket costs and not receiving necessary care. 

Forty percent of hospitals continue to lose money from operating costs. Challenging denials requires a lot of sophisticated resources that are already scarce. The appeals process is incredibly complicated. 

Q: Could you share an example where strategic changes to denial management processes led to significant improvements? 

JM: Denials are not overcome on a case-by-case basis. We recently worked with a health system that understood that. In collaboration, we developed an analytical infrastructure that measured and compared denial behavior across multiple payers. This informed the organization’s denial management strategy. They drove payer behavior change at the contract level by exercising escalation paths. Using data, they identified consistent trends that the payer was demonstrating. Not only did the organization change payer behavior, but they also obtained a cash settlement for inappropriately denied claims and added an independent review organization into the contract to resolve denials more fairly moving forward. 

Once the organization got their biggest payer performing better, they used the same steps for the second-biggest payer and achieved a similar level of success. It’s an approach they can use on a payer-by-payer basis. 

Q: What role do clinical leaders play in the denial management process, and how can their involvement be optimized? 

JM: Denials management is an all-hands-on-deck situation. It’s crucial to remember that at the center is first and foremost a patient, and second a provider. Patients are more than a bunch of codes in a medical record, and physicians are more than automatons that document. Providers have insight and experience that can help us navigate denial challenges. We need everybody to work together. 

 

Book a Strategy Call

Strategic Escalation in the Face of Rising MA Plan Denials

Strategic Escalation in the Face of Rising MA Plan Denials

Strategic Escalation in the Face of Rising MA Plan Denials  Originally published on Becker's Hosptal ReviewRelationships between providers and Medicare Advantage (MA) plans have become more strained as payers aggressively deny claims. To ensure providers' financial...

Inside AI-Driven Medical Coding

Inside AI-Driven Medical Coding

Hospitals are struggling with medical coding workforce shortages and revenue cycle delays. However, AI-driven coding offers immense promise in solving these challenges.

The Limitations of CMI as a KPI

The Limitations of CMI as a KPI

How well do you understand your hospital’s Case Mix Index (CMI) and its impact on hospital performance? Uncover the factors influencing this popular healthcare metric. Listen to Managing Director of Strategic Advisor Services Sam Dominik explain more…

Compliantly Supercharge Your Hospital’s Bottom Line: The Strategic Power of CDI Programs

Compliantly Supercharge Your Hospital’s Bottom Line: The Strategic Power of CDI Programs

Transform your hospital’s Clinical Documentation Program into a strategic asset that drives financial performance and quality improvement. Read our latest article and learn how robust CDI programs consistently optimize revenue, ensure compliance, and improve patient care by leveraging technology, engaging staff, and integrating best practices for substantial financial and operational advantages.

Empowering Healthcare Providers Against Rising Payer Denials

Empowering Healthcare Providers Against Rising Payer Denials

Fighting back against rising payer denials requires a partner with deep expertise and a strategic approach. We leverage our proprietary analytics, clinical regulatory knowledge, and extensive experience to support providers in overcoming financial challenges and ensuring patient access. Let’s work together towards a more sustainable future in healthcare.

Beyond the Denial Epidemic

Beyond the Denial Epidemic

CorroHealth CEO Pat Leonard brings to light a growing crisis: the alarming surge in payer denials that directly threaten patient care and hospital stability across the U.S. With a staggering $20 billion spent annually to overturn half of initially denied claims, the urgency to enforce existing regulations is more urgent than ever, for the sake of patient care and access.

In this enlightening article, Leonard highlights the pivotal role of clinical leaders. Their unwavering advocacy for fair reimbursement reshapes the industry, demonstrating how clinical excellence and financial stability can be intertwined.

The AI-Powered Solution to the Medical Coding Worker Shortage

The AI-Powered Solution to the Medical Coding Worker Shortage

Facing a coder shortage? Read how #AI addresses this #healthcare industry #MedicalCoding worker shortage. PULSE by CorroHealth, an AI-driven medical coding platform, reshapes your Revenue Cycle Management with cutting-edge technology, improving productivity and addressing the critical shortage of medical coders.
#CorroHealth #RCM #HealthTech #HealthcareTechnology #LLM #DeepLearning

More from CorroHealth

The $23.5 Million Difference in Patient Status Determinations

The $23.5 Million Difference in Patient Status Determinations

The $23.5 Million Difference in Patient Status DeterminationsHow One Strategic Partnership Catalyzed Hospital Utilization Management Strategies and Revenue Growth Overview A top-tier nonprofit health system in Southwest Florida is ranked among the top 15% of hospitals...

Strategic Escalation in the Face of Rising MA Plan Denials

Strategic Escalation in the Face of Rising MA Plan Denials

Strategic Escalation in the Face of Rising MA Plan Denials  Originally published on Becker's Hosptal ReviewRelationships between providers and Medicare Advantage (MA) plans have become more strained as payers aggressively deny claims. To ensure providers' financial...

How Improved RAF Accuracy Unlocked $12M in Revenue

How Improved RAF Accuracy Unlocked $12M in Revenue

How CoxHealth and CorroHealth Improved RAF Accuracy, Unlocked $12M in Revenue, and Enhanced Value-Based Care Accurate Risk Adjustment Factor (RAF) scores aren't just numbers, they directly impact care quality, resource allocation, and financial success for healthcare...